Comparative study of ECPR introduction of fluoroscopy-guided and conventional methods

The introduction of fluoroscopy-guided ECPR reduces the incidence of complications - A retrospective study for ECPR protocol "PCPS call"

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-jRCT1012220035

Enrollment

Registered

2023-01-18

Start date

2023-01-18

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Heart Arrest, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ECPR were collected by extracting patients with ECMO from electronic medical records between May 2017 and March 2022.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients introducing ECMO outside of CPA, the time of awareness - transport to ED and transport to ED - PCPS pump on is not clearly recoded, or in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the incidence of complications during ECPR	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the interval from awareness to ED arrival, time from ED arrival to PCPS establishment, PCPS withdrawal rate, ventilator withdrawal rate, 28-day survival rate, survival discharge rate, and discharge rate with favorable neurological outcome. Neurologically-favorable survival was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 to 2.	—

Contacts

Public ContactSoichi Tanaka

Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine

soichi.t321@gmail.com+81-11-611-2111

Outcome results