Skip to content

Is the McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope useful for intubation of infants by anesthesiology trainees?: a randomized controlled trial

A randomized, single-blind, actual-machine controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope for intubation of infants by anesthesiology trainees - RCT on the efficacy of McGRATH MAC use in infants

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1012210051
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-11-19
Start date
2021-11-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient undergoing general anesthesia

Interventions

Assign the laryngoscope to be used during intubation to a video laryngoscope group that uses a video laryngoscope (McGRATH MAC AO3 video laryngoscope) that provides images of the epiglottis on a scree

Sponsors

Fujita Noriaki
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who will undergo routine non-cardiac surgery with a scheduled duration of 30 minutes or more under general anesthesia at the implementing medical institution participating in this study and who meet the following conditions (1) Males and females who are less than 1 year of age at the time of obtaining consent (2) Those who have obtained written consent for participation in this study after receiving sufficient explanation and understanding from a surrogate (a person who is considered to be able to represent the will and interests of the research subject).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients who will not be intubated orally by an anesthesiologist (cases in which nasal intubation, mask ventilation, and airway maintenance with supraglottic devices are planned) (2) Patients who are expected to have difficulty in intubation based on physical examination during preoperative consultation (e.g., deformity of the face or airway) (3) Patients whose weight was less than 3 kg at the time of consent. (4) Patients with a history of difficult intubation during general anesthesia in the past (more than 3 intubations not for the purpose of tracheal tube replacement, or more than Grade III of the Cormack Classification*1) (5) If the subject is intubated for the second time or more, the subject is scheduled to be intubated by the same anesthesiologist who performed the intubation in the past. (6) Cases in which the anesthesiologist cannot be in charge of intubation due to staffing limitations. (7) Other patients who are judged by the principal investigator to be inappropriate as research subjects. 1 Cormack classification: Grade I: vocal cords can be observed, II: vocal cords can be partially observed, III: vocal cords cannot be observed, but epiglottis can be observed, IV: epiglottis cannot be observed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in first-time intubation success rates between direct-view laryngoscopes and video laryngoscopes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1Time required for intubation 2Number of intubations 3Glottal visibility time 4Intubation tube insertion time 5Apnea time 6Glottal visibility score (Cormack classification, POGO score) 7Intubation difficulty score 8Changes in vital signs before and after intubation 9Incidence of disease, etc.

Contacts

Public ContactYuka Uchinami

Department of Anesthesiology

yukauma923@gmail.com+81-11-706-7861

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026