Skip to content

A study investigating the persistence of respiratory effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in stable post-extubation patients

Evaluation of the sustained physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula in stable post-extubation patients: A randomized crossover trial comparing with conventional oxygen therapy via nasal cannula - Evaluation of the sustained physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula in stable post-extubation patients: A randomized crossover trial comparing with conventional oxygen therapy via nasal cannula

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000061356
Enrollment
34
Registered
2026-05-01
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Interventions

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 30 L/min for 30 minutes, followed by standard oxygen therapy via nasal cannula for 30 minutes. FiO2/flow adjusted to maintain SpO2 92-96%. Standard oxygen therapy via

Sponsors

St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
Lead Sponsor
Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (P/F ratio <=300) during endotracheal intubation management in ICU 2. Patients who underwent PEEP adjustment with EIT during intubation management 3. Patients who had esophageal pressure tube inserted for transpulmonary pressure monitoring during intubation management 4. Patients who used HFNC after extubation 5. Patients who have been weaned from HFNC 30%/30L for 6-24 hours or more and have oxygen requirements 6. Patients who provided written informed consent for this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or breastfeeding 2. Age under 18 years 3. Consciousness disturbance 4. Pneumothorax findings on chest X-ray or CT 5. COPD GOLD stage IV 6. Contraindication to esophageal pressure measurement and/or EIT (electrical impedance tomography) monitoring 7. Patients with tracheostomy 8. End-of-life status or palliative care goals 9. Other patients judged inappropriate by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Global EELZ (End-Expiratory Lung Impedance): End-expiratory lung impedance measured by EIT, reflecting functional residual capacity and serving as a surrogate marker of PEEP effect by HFNC.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EIT measurements: Ventral EELZ, Dorsal EELZ, GI index, Ventral/Dorsal ventilation ratio, Global deltaZ, Ventral deltaZ, Dorsal deltaZ, Minute deltaZ Esophageal pressure balloon measurements: Delta PES, PTP Vital signs: Blood pressure, Respiratory rate, SpO2, Pulse rate, ROX index (SpO2/FiO2/RR) Blood gas analysis: PaO2, PaCO2, pH, HCO3 Patient-reported outcomes: Comfort (NRS 0-10), Dyspnea (NRS 0-10)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactAtsuhito Inoue

St. Marianna University School of Medicine Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

atsuhito.inoue.2@marianna-u.ac.jp+81-44-977-8111(ext3931)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026