Skip to content

The Impact of Promoting Symptom Perception with electronic Patient-Reported outcome on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure.: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

The Impact of Promoting Symptom Perception with electronic Patient-Reported outcome on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure.: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial. - SPEC-HF Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000061248
Enrollment
220
Registered
2026-04-14
Start date
2026-04-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Interventions

To promote symptom awareness, participants are asked to periodically complete the Heart Failure Physical Sensation Scale. Symptom assessments using ePRO are requested once a week for the first month a

Sponsors

Teikyo Heisei University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.18 years of age or older 2.Diagnosed with heart failure and currently hospitalized 3.Written consent has been obtained from the patient 4.Able to enter ePRO data via Bring Your Own Device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Has cognitive difficulties that make it hard to complete the PRO questionnaire 2. Has mental health issues that make it hard to complete the PRO questionnaire 3. Does not speak Japanese as a native language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This trial will use ePRO to screen for heart failure related symptoms over time and will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical utility of promoting symptom awareness, using standard care which does not promote symptom awareness as the control. For the two groups the intervention group, which received HFSPS to promote symptom awareness, and the control group general linear model will be fitted using the KCCQ12 overall summary score at 3 and 6 months as the response variable, and group, time, the interaction between group and time, and the baseline KCCQ12 overall summary score as explanatory variables.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the KCCQ12 subscales Physical Limitation, Symptom Frequency, Quality of Life, and Social Limitation using general linear models and the same methodology as in the primary analysis.Estimate and test for differences between the intervention and control groups in the BMQ TNS, TCS, and NCD scores at 24 weeks postdischarge.Summarize the proportion of HFSPS entries in the intervention group using descriptive statistics.Estimate and test for differences in the EFHScBS score at 24 weeks postdischarge between the intervention and control groups.Estimate and test for differences in DA and DAOH between the intervention and control groups.The time to first readmission for heart failure or any cause will be estimated using the Kaplan Meier method for survival analysis, and group comparisons will be performed using the logrank test. Additionally, the hazard ratio and 95 percent confidence interval will be calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the hazard ratio between groups.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMasanori SUZUKI

Teikyo Heisei University Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences

ma.suzuki@thu.ac.jp+81-3-5860-4711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026