Large bore plastic stents (11.5Fr) versus fully covered self-expandable metallic stents for the management of preoperative endoscopic biliary obstruction in pancreatic cancer: multicenter retrospective cohort study

LBPS vs SEMS - LBPS vs SEMS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000060443

Enrollment

Registered

2026-02-01

Start date

2026-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pancreatic cancer

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Pathologically proven pancreatic cancer classified as resectable or borderline resectable by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (or biopsy)(EUS-FNA,FNB) (2) Underwent preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic cancer using LBPS or 10-12mm FCSEMS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Biliary drainage was obtained with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), except for the rendezvous technique (2) Coexisting malignant biliary obstruction involving the hilar part of the biliary system (2 cm below the confluence) (3) Biliary drainage at other centers (4) previous history of surgical biliary reconstruction (5) adverse events, such as hemorrhage or perforation, occurring before stent deployment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of Patency Between 11.5Fr Large-Diameter Plastic Stents and Metallic Stents	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMaruta Akinori

Gifu University Hospital First Department of Internal Medicine

mrak5844@yahoo.co.jp058-230-6308

Outcome results