Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis

Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis - Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000060409

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-20

Start date

2026-01-18

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who underwent general anesthesia

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia in the supine position. 2. Patients for whom intraoperative invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is required as part of standard blood pressure monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Emergency surgery. 2. Known preoperative arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation. 3. Patients in whom blood pressure measurement on both arms is difficult (e.g., post-breast cancer surgery, hemodialysis patients). 4. A preoperative inter-arm blood pressure difference of > 10 mmHg in mean arterial pressure.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In this study, we will compare blood pressure values obtained with the noninvasive blood pressure monitor, the VitaWave finger cuff, with invasive arterial pressure measured via a radial arterial catheter in elective surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia , using error grid analysis.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakashi Juri

Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

takataka0061@yahoo.co.jp0666452186

Outcome results