Skip to content

The effectiveness of 19G FNA and 22G FNB needle for diagnosing lymphadenopathy

The effectiveness of 19G FNA and 22G FNB needle for diagnosing lymphadenopathy - The effectiveness of 19G FNA and 22G FNB needle for diagnosing lymphadenopathy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000060120
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-01-01
Start date
2025-11-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

other
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: >17-years-old EUS-FNA performed cases with mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy using 19G FNA or 22G FNB needle

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Use of needles other than the 19-gauge FNA needle or 22-gauge FNB needle inability to provide informed consent The patients who are otherwise judged by the investigator to be ineligible to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic accuracy of each puncture needle for lymphadenopathy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic sensitivity of malignant lymphoma for each needle (including 7AAD analysis and G-Band) Adverse events

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMitsuru Okuno

Matsunami General Hospital Gastroenterology

mkobdkl@yahoo.co.jp0583880111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026