Skip to content

Radiographic Outcomes of Knees Operated According to the Indications for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference in Radiolucent Lines?

Radiographic Outcomes of Knees Operated According to the Indications for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty - the Indications for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000059347
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-10-09
Start date
2025-10-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Takagi Hospital Oume Knee Surgery Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cementless fixation is selected for knees with a preoperative tibial bone mineral density of 46.7 or higher on CT, while cemented fixation is chosen for knees with a density below 46.7.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severely valgus knees requiring stem extension, knees requiring augmentation, and knees with more than 11 mm of lateral tibial resection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To investigate the incidence of radiolucent lines at one year postoperatively in knees operated according to the proposed indication criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) Clinical outcomes at one year postoperatively, including the 2011 Knee Score, FJS-12, or other PROMs; (2) presence of early loosening, assessed by the rate of subsidence; and (3) the relationship between step count and the incidence of radiolucent lines.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYoshinori Mikashima

Takagi Hospital Oume Knee Surgery Center

ymikashima2007@yahoo.co.jp0428315255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026