Comparison of recovery profile after remimazolam-fentanyl anesthesia and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia for pulsed field ablation

Comparison of recovery profile after remimazolam-fentanyl anesthesia and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia for pulsed field ablation: a prospective randomized trial - Comparison of recovery profile after remimazolam-fentanyl anesthesia and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia for pulsed field ablation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000059210

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-01

Start date

2025-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients with atrial fibrillation

Interventions

The administration of propofol and fentanyl to maintain general anesthesia The administration of propofol and fentanyl to maintain general anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for pulsed field ablation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with hepatic dysfunction of Child-Pugh classification B or higher Patients receiving renal replacement therapy Severely obese patients (Body mass index 35 or higher) Dementia patients Patients who are allergic to anesthetics

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time from the end of anesthetic administration to extubate the airway device	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time from the end of anesthetic administration to open eyes, to be able to respond to a call, and to reach a Fast-Track Criteria score of 12 or higher	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakashi Kondo

Hiroshima Heart Center Department of Anesthesiology

yrdcn850@yahoo.co.jp0828748080

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026