Skip to content

A Single-center Prospective Comparison Study of Blood Culture Contamination Rates Between Peripheral Venipuncture and Non-wire Hub Collection During Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Critically ill Patients

A Single-center study of Blood Culture Contamination Risk from Peripheral Venous Blood Collection Compared to Non-wire Hub Blood Collection During Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Critically Ill Patients - Contamination of Blood Culture: Venipuncture vs Non-wire hub during Central line insertion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000059037
Enrollment
280
Registered
2025-09-09
Start date
2025-10-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Culture Contamination

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sakai City Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in whom an infection was suspected and from whom blood cultures were obtained from both a CVC nonwire lumen and a peripheral vein based on the clinician's judgmentAdults aged 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals who declined to participate in the research Individuals deemed unsuitable by the principal investigator or co-investigators

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Blood culture contamination rates during central venous catheter insertion and venipuncture

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
True bacteremia rate Positive Agreement Rate Obtained volume of blood culture

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKohei Hasegawa

Sakai City Medical Center Department of infectious diseases

ipph86txs@gmail.com09098701250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026