Skip to content

Analysis of Various Factors and Evaluation of Rehabilitation Outcomes in Inpatients of a Rehabilitation Ward

Analysis of Factors Associated with ADL Improvement and Rehabilitation Efficacy in Patients Admitted to a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward: A Retrospective Observational Study - Analysis of Factors for ADL in Rehabilitation - Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000059027
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2025-09-08
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cerebrovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, disuse syndrome, etc.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fujita Health University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients admitted to the recovery rehabilitation ward between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2030

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Nothing in particular

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a. Basic Information * Age * Primary disease * Past medical history * Date of onset * Dates of admission and discharge * Duration of therapy/training * Brain imaging data * X-ray imaging data * Motor ability * Video data * Level of consciousness * Nutritional status * Information on social resources * Orthoses and assistive devices used * Problem list * Standardized tasks, etc. b. Information Based on Assessments b-1. Assessment of Physical Function * Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) * American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale * Frankel Classification * Muscle strength * Range of Motion (ROM) assessment, etc. b-2. Assessment of Functional Ability * Functional Independence Measure (FIM) * Spatiotemporal gait parameters (e.g., velocity, cadence, stride, step count) * Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) * Gait Ability Assessment for Hemiplegics (GAA) and other gait ability assessments * Standard Test for Aphasia and Dysarthria (STAD) * Independence checklist, etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
b-3. Assessment of Higher Brain Function * Hasegawa's Dementia Scale-Revised (HDS-R) * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) * Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) * Trail Making Test (TMT) * Kohs Block Design Test (KBDT) * Cognitive-related Behavioral Assessment (CBA) * Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), etc. b-4. Assessment for Aphasia * Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) * Communication effectiveness scales, etc. b-5. Assessment for Dysarthria * Assessment of Motor Speech for Dysarthria (AMSD) * Auditory-perceptual evaluation of hoarseness (GRBAS scale) * Sound pressure level measurement (e.g., maximum phonation, coughing, conversation) * Speech intelligibility assessment, etc. b-6. Assessment for Dysphagia * Original Inoue-Evaluation for Aspiration Lung Disease (i-EALD) * Sound pressure level measurement (e.g., maximum phonation, coughing, conversation) * Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) * Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test (RSST) * Modified Water Swallowing Test (MWST) * Fujishima's Ingestive and Swallowing ability Scale (FILS) * Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS), etc. c. Information Based on Incident, Accident, and Near-Miss Reports * Profession/Job title of the staff involved * Years of experience * Department/Affiliation * Incident level/severity * Date of occurrence * Fall risk assessment * Dementia independence level * Type of incident * Cause of incident * Description/Circumstances of the incident * Response of the patient and family * Preventive measures and guidance provided, etc.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKenji Kawakami

Kitaoji Hospital for Neurological Rehabilitation Department of Rehabilitation

kenji07n@fujita-hu.ac.jp0757815111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026