Participants receiving occupational therapy who have had, are having, or will have interventions using Management Tool for Daily Life Performance (MTDLP).
Conditions
Interventions
Management Tool for Daily Life Performance Sheet (MTDLP)
Sponsors
Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Participants receiving occupational therapy who have had, are having, or will have interventions using Management Tool for Daily Life Performance (MTDLP).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Participants with a clear lack of decision-making skills (Cognitive decline, impaired consciousness) that makes it difficult to understand and agree with the study description. Participants with acute deterioration at the start of the study (unless the attending physician individually determined that occupational therapy and the study were acceptable).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Interview content based on semi-structured interviews | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| (1) MTDLP Sheet ((1) General Information Sheet (2) Daily Life Performance Interview Sheet (3) Management Tool for Daily Life Performance Sheet (4) Daily Life Performance Analysis Sheet (5) Social Resources Information Sheet) (2) Performance level, Degree of satisfaction (3) Functional independence at the start of intervention and at the re-evaluation approximately three months later Functional Independence Measure (FIM) or Barthel Index (BI) (4) Assessment of physical and mental functions tailored to each disease characteristic at the start of intervention and at the three-month follow-up evaluation. Examples for orthopedic diseases: Joint range of motion measurement, sensory function (Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments test: SWME), grip strength, pinch strength, patient-reported outcomes (Quick The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: Q-DASH). Examples for cerebrovascular disorders: Degree of motor paralysis (Fugl-Meyer Assessment: FMA), upper limb function assessment (Box and Block Test: BBT or Action Research Arm Test: ARAT), evaluation of the use of the paralyzed hand (Motor Activity Log: MAL), sensory function (SWME) In addition to the examples listed above, this includes physical and mental function assessments that are typically conducted as part of occupational therapy evaluations and interventions for other diseases, and is not limited to the diseases and assessment items illustrated above. (5) At the time of re-evaluation, the Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC) is used to assess the degree of improvement, no change, or deterioration on a 5-point scale. | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactHiroshi YUINE
Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Department of Occupational Therapy
Outcome results
None listed