Comparison of surgical efficiency, patient comfort, and AI-driven analysis between UNITY and Centurion systems in cataract surgery

Comparison of surgical efficiency, patient comfort, and AI-driven analysis between UNITY and Centurion systems in cataract surgery - Comparative evaluation of cataract surgery systems

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000058050

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-02

Start date

2025-06-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cataract

Interventions

cataract surgery using UNITY cataract surgery with Centurion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with age-related cataract who are undergoing phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with intraoperative complications Patients with organic ocular diseases Others deemed unsuitable by the physician (e.g., due to ocular history)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ultrasound time Duration from insertion to removal of the phaco tip within the eye Patient comfort level	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Cumulative energy used Aspiration time Amount of BSS used Corneal thickness on the day after surgery Corneal endothelial cell density one month after surgery Phaco tip movement analyzed by AI (nuclear holding power) Time-course changes in intraoperative parameters analyzed by AI	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTetsuro Oshika

University of Tsukuba Department of Ophthalmology

oshika@eye.ac0298516927

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026