Gingival Recession is a common periodontal condition that leads to aesthetic concerns and potential tooth sensitivity. Various surgical approaches have been developed to manage this condition, with the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) being one of the most frequently employed techniques. Recent advances have introduced Mucoderm, a Collagen Matrix, to enhance outcomes when combined with CAF. However, the comparative efficacy of CAF alone versus CAF combined with Mucoderm remains under-explored.
Conditions
Interventions
CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP AND MUCODERM FOR ROOT COVERAGE
CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP ALONE FOR ROOT COVERAGE
Sponsors
CSI COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Presence of Gingival Recession of Miller Class I or Class II. Age of 18 to 40 years old. Systemically healthy with no contraindications for periodontal surgery. Absence of clinical signs of active periodontal disease.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Systemic disease with compromised healing potential or infectious disease. Usage of medication known to affect gingival conditions (hyperplasia) or to interfere with healing (steroids). Pregnant or Lactating mothers. Non-vital teeth, caries, prosthetic crowns or restorations involving the cemento-enamel junction area. Tobacco smoking, drug or alcohol abuse.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare and evaluate the changes in Clinical Parameters such as Recession Depth (RD), Gingival Thickness (GT) and Width of Attached Gingiva (WAG) among patients undergoing surgical treatment with Coronally Advanced Flap with Mucoderm (Test group) and Coronally Advanced Flap alone (Control group) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To assess Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at 2 weeks and Questionnaires (patient satisfaction) at 3 months, and Professional Esthetic Evaluation using Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES) at 3 months, among patients undergoing surgical treatment with Coronally Advanced Flap with Mucoderm (Test group) and Coronally Advanced Flap alone (Control group). To compare and evaluate the changes in Clinical Parameters especially Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) among patients undergoing surgical treatment with Coronally Advanced Flap with Mucoderm (Test group) and Coronally Advanced Flap alone (Control group) at baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment. | — |
Countries
Asia(except Japan)
Contacts
Public ContactJANE MAANSINGH
CSI COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF PERIODONTICS AND IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Outcome results
None listed