Skip to content

PulsE field Ablation versus Cryoballoon ablation in patients with pErsistent atrial fibrillation: PEACE trial

PulsE field Ablation versus Cryoballoon ablation in patients with pErsistent atrial fibrillation: PEACE trial - PEACE trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000057896
Enrollment
300
Registered
2025-05-18
Start date
2025-05-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent atrial fibrillation

Interventions

Cryoballoon group PulseSelect group

Sponsors

Kitasato University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation scheduled to undergo catheter ablation treatment. Persistent atrial fibrillation is defined, according to relevant guidelines, as atrial fibrillation that persists for up to one year, or cases requiring antiarrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversion. Indications for catheter ablation will follow the Guidelines for Non-Pharmacotherapy of Arrhythmias (2018 revision) and the Focused Update of the Arrhythmia Treatment Guidelines (2024) issued by the Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. Patients aged between 18 and 85 years at the time of consent. Patients capable of providing written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation lasting more than one year. Patients who have previously undergone catheter ablation or surgical ablation. Patients with a left atrial diameter greater than 55 mm. Patients for whom cryoballoon ablation or pulsed field ablation is not suitable: --Patients judged unable to receive contrast media due to conditions such as chronic kidney disease, bronchial asthma, or contrast agent allergy (contrast media is required for cryoballoon ablation). Any other patients deemed unsuitable by the attending physician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) Efficacy Endpoints Efficacy will be assessed using the following composite endpoints: Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia: Recurrence is defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) lasting 30 seconds or more within one year after a 90-day post-procedure blanking period, or the need for repeat ablation. Assessment will be conducted using 24-hour Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months. Additionally, arrhythmias detected on 12-lead ECGs during emergency visits for palpitations will also be included. Acute procedural failure: If the treatment cannot be completed using only the cryoballoon catheter or the pulsed field ablation catheter and requires additional devices (e.g., radiofrequency ablation catheters), it will be considered a procedural failure. 2) Safety Endpoints The incidence of procedure-related complications occurring during the procedure or within 30 days postoperatively will be assessed. The perioperative period is defined as within 30 days after the procedure, during which the following complications will be evaluated: air embolism during the procedure, cardiac tamponade, cerebral infarction (including TIA), systemic embolism, vascular complications, phrenic nerve palsy, esophageal complications, and gastric peristalsis disorders. Secondary Endpoints 1) Differences in left atrial diameter reduction (preoperative, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively) 2) Changes in blood biomarkers such as BNP and NT-proBNP (preoperative, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively) 3) Relationship between atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and recurrence in the late phase 4) Evaluation of subjective symptoms on the day after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10 used to self-assess pain and discomfort, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHidehira Fukaya

Kitasato University School of Medicine Cardiovascular Medicine

hidehira@med.kitasato-u.ac.jp042-778-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026