Skip to content

Assessment of Lymphatic Drainage Capacity in Patients with Liver Disease Using Lipiodol

Assessment of Lymphatic Drainage Capacity in Patients with Liver Disease Using Lipiodol - Assessment of Lymphatic Drainage Capacity in Patients with Liver Disease Using Lipiodol

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000057582
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
2025-03-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver cirrhosis with ascites

Interventions

Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites will undergo lymphangiography once during hospitalization. A total of 10 mL of Lipiodol will be injected into the right inguinal lymph node. After completion

Sponsors

Ehime University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 20 years or older with liver cirrhosis who have a history of hepatic ascites and currently have persistent ascites. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. No restrictions regarding sex.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are unable to remain at rest during the procedure. Patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast agents. Patients with comorbid conditions other than liver disease that may cause systemic edema, such as heart failure with BNP >= 100 pg/mL or renal disease with proteinuria (>= 3+) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Pregnant women or patients who may be pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome of this study is to clarify the relationship between lymphatic drainage function and the severity of hepatic ascites. Patients will be stratified into two groups based on their response to diuretics: a non-refractory ascites group (ascites improved with diuretics) and a refractory ascites group (ascites not improved despite diuretic treatment). The contrast agent inflow velocity was compared between the groups.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMasashi Hirooka

Ehime University of Medicine Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology

masashih@m.ehime-u.ac.jp089-960-5308

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026