Skip to content

Which Treatment Works Best When Bleeding from Facial Fractures Doesn't Stop? A Study Comparing Surgery, Catheter Embolization, and Arterial Ligation

Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation versus TAE (via IVR) or External Carotid Artery Ligation for Hemorrhagic Shock Due to Facial Fractures - SR of Surgery vs IVR-TAE or ECA Ligation for Hemorrhagic Shock in Facial Fractures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000057569
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-04-10
Start date
2025-04-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhagic shock persisting despite tamponade with packing or ballooning for oral or nasal bleeding caused by facial bone fractures

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Osaka University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with hemorrhagic shock

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Studies not targeting hemorrhagic shock caused by facial bone fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Short-term mortality, Transfusion volume, Length of hospital stay, Length of ICU stay, Complications of embolization or ischemia, Time to shock resolution, Serious adverse events

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTomoya Hirose

Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine

htomoya1979@hp-emerg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp0668795707

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026