Skip to content

A systematic review of the blood pressure lowering effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA).

A systematic review of the blood pressure lowering effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). - A systematic review of the blood pressure lowering effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000057558
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2025-04-09
Start date
2025-04-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy adults

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

FANCL Corporation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: P-Participant: Participant The subjects were healthy adults (those who are not suffering from any diseases, excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women) Regarding blood pressure, subjects included those with high-normal blood pressure and those with stage 1 hypertension. I-Intervention: Intervention (food) characteristics Continuous intake of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), Unlimited dosage forms, shapes and amounts. The intervention period was based on 12 weeks, which is the standard testing method of Food for specified health uses(TOKUHO). C-Comparison: Comparison group Placebo or a similar food that did not contain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). O-Outcome: Evaluation items Main outcomes:Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure S-Study design: Research design The research designs used in the literature were randomized parallel group controlled trials (RCTPs), randomized crossover trials (RCTCOs), and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs). In addition, the languages of presentation were documents written in Japanese and English. As a general rule, the presentation format will be an original paper, and papers in the form of short reports or summaries will also be accepted if the content can be specified. Abstracts of academic conference presentations (conference minutes) were excluded because their descriptive content was considered insufficient. There was no question as to whether or not the journal in which the article was published had been peer-reviewed. To avoid publication bias, we also included studies with results published in clinical trial registry databases. Regarding gray literature, we decided to use doctoral theses, reports from government agencies, think tanks, etc. whose detailed contents could be identified.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The literature which does not meet the key inclusion criteria will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic Blood Pressure Diastolic Blood Pressure

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMasakazu Katsu

FANCL Corporation Functional Food Research Institute

gakujutsu_sdi@fancl.co.jp045-226-1392

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026