The impact of real-rime AI guidance on Point-of-Care Ultrasound examinations performed by residents

Impact of Real-Time AI Guidance on Image Acquisition Time in Resident Physicians Performing Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Randomized Crossover Trial - Impact of Real-Time AI Guidance on Image Acquisition Time in Resident Physicians Performing Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000057102

Enrollment

Registered

2025-02-21

Start date

2025-02-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy adult

Interventions

Prior to the initiation of this study, all participating resident physicians will be administered a brief lecture by an emergency medicine specialist. Resident physicians will perform echocardiograp

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Medical Qualification: a junior resident A beginner in ultrasound with 1-2 years of experience Have basic cardiac ultrasound knowledge

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Prior formal training in echocardiography

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to image acquisition for five standard echocardiographic views recommended by the POCUS guideline in Japan: PLAX, PSAX-PM, AP4, SubC4, and SubC-IVC.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time to image acquisition for all ten standard echocardiographic views, including the five views used for the primary outcome plus the following five views: PSAX-AV, PSAX-MV, AP5, AP3 and AP2. The quality of acquired images.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakashi Shinato

Sugita Genpaku Memorial Obama Municipal Hospital Emergency and general medical department

doctor.s.u.t@icloud.com0770-52-0990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026