Skip to content

effectiveness of occupational therapy practice based on the process analysis of daily activity for dementia in patients with hip fractures a nonrandomized comparative study

effectiveness of occupational therapy practice based on the process analysis of daily activity for dementia in patients with hip fractures a nonrandomized comparative study - effectiveness of occupational therapy practice based on the process analysis of daily activity for dementia in patients with hip fractures a nonrandomized comparative study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000056817
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-04-01
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hip fractures

Interventions

The intervention lasted 6 weeks, with PADAD-based interventions performed approximately 6 times per week. Usually occupational therapy group.

Sponsors

Tokyo Metropolitan Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were persons 65 years of age or older with a diagnosis of hip fracture who were admitted to Hospital A, which has subacute and convalescent wards.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with decision-making difficulties, patients with a significant physical disability other than hip fracture, patients with delirium, and patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Information on the subjects is collected from their medical records, including gender, age, diagnosis, level of care, Mini-Mental State Examination, and grip strength. The main indices are FIM and FIM-motor items (FIM-m), FIM-cognitive items (FIM-c), and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence (TMIG-IC) as indices of ADLs and IADLs. The MOS8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) was used to measure quality of life. The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) was used to measure mental/psychological status. To capture subjective changes in daily living activities, we measure satisfaction and performance of the PADA-D on a scale of 1 to 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In addition to the PADA-D scores, secondary measures included the 30-second chair stand test (CS-30) as a measure of lower limb muscle strength, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) as a measure of pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) as a measure of pain, and the Hospital Anxiety a Depression Scale (HADS) as a measure of anxiety and depression.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKei Takahashi

Tokyo Metropolitan Rehabilitation Hospital Rehabilitation Center

tmr.ot.takahashi@outlook.jp03-3616-8600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026