Minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy alone, endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: A propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy alone, endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: A propensity score-based cohort analysis. - ESBD vs EST

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000056742

Enrollment

1000

Registered

2025-01-17

Start date

2025-01-17

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

common bile duct stone

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who underwent successful ESBD or EST for the management of CBDS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) a prior history of papillary intervention 2) patients who underwent ERCP for CBDS after upper gastrointestinal or biliary tract surgery, except for gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction and cholecystectomy 3) patients who performed two-stage endoscopic management in which only biliary drainage is performed in the initial ERCP, and papillary procedure and stone extraction are performed in the second sessionpatients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound rendezvous (EUS-RV) for bile duct cannulation 4) patients with gallstone pancreatitis 5) patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound rendezvous (EUS-RV) for bile duct cannulation 6) presence of upper gastrointestinal or pancreatobiliary malignancies.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Early adverse events of the EST and ESBD group.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactAkinori Maruta

Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center Department of Gastroenterology

mrak5844@yahoo.co.jp0582461111

Outcome results