Healthy subjects,Upper limb dysfunction
Conditions
Interventions
The subject wears an accelerometer on their body and performs upper-body movements in their daily life, such as dressing and taking medication.
Sponsors
Fujita Health University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1) Healthy subjects People who have no history of upper extremity dysfunction due to stroke, neuromuscular disease, or bone and joint disease, and who have given informed consent for this study. 2) Upper extremity dysfunction Patients with upper extremity dysfunction who have given informed consent for this study.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: People whose general condition is unstable. People who have difficulty following instructions when performing tasks due to impaired consciousness or cognitive function.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Upper extremity movement analysis measurement values and questionnaire on the use of the upper extremities in daily life activities. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Background information such as age, gender, upper extremity length, etc. Basic motor function. Clinical assessment data such as SIAS, FMA, FIM, etc. Video at the time of assessment. Upper extremity function assessment using 3D motion analysis. | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactHirofumi Ota
Fujita Health University Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences
Outcome results
None listed