Comparison of the usefulness of different types of video laryngoscopes for difficult airway management simulation: a randomized crossover manikin study

Comparison of the usefulness of different types of video laryngoscopes for difficult airway management simulation: a randomized crossover manikin study - Comparison of the usefulness of different types of video laryngoscopes for difficult airway management simulation: a randomized crossover manikin study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000055567

Enrollment

Registered

2024-09-20

Start date

2024-09-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

in a manikin study

Interventions

Comparision test of intubation time when using Airwayscope, Mc GRATH, i-view

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Anesthesiologist who had done less than 200 tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: without concent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
intubation time	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
success rate Cormack and Lehane grade	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKyotaro Koshika

Tokyo Dental College Dental Anesthesiology

koshikakyotarou@tdc.ac.jp03-6380-9001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026