Skip to content

Comparison of safety of diazepam and midazolam for moderate sedation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Comparison of safety of benzodiazepines for moderate sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection - Comparison of benzodiazepines in sedation during ESD

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000054966
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2024-07-20
Start date
2024-05-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric tumor

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Consecutive patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms at Gifu University Hospital in Japan between January 2015 and March 2024 were enrolled.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients classified as Class 4 of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Classification System were not indicated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of deep sedation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) The proportion of patients who maintained moderate sedation during procedure, (2) oxygen desaturation, defined as a SpO2 drop of 5% or more, or increased oxygen supplementation. (3) incidence of bradypnea, defined as respiratory rate < 8 breaths/min. (4) incidence of blood pressure (BP) reduction, defined as a drop in systolic BP greater than 30% of the baseline value. (5) incidence of bradycardia, defined as heart rate < 50 beats/min. (6) incidence of ESD-related pneumonia.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactJun Takada

Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Gastroenterology

jun_yuri1_1@yahoo.co.jp0582306308

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026