A comparison of electromyographic recovery of the rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block between the adductor pollicis muscle and the flexor hallucis brevis muscle in infants.

A comparison of electromyographic recovery of the rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block between the adductor pollicis muscle and the flexor hallucis brevis muscle in infants. - A comparison of electromyographic recovery of the rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block between the adductor pollicis muscle and the flexor hallucis brevis muscle in infants.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000054446

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-01

Start date

2024-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia

Interventions

Monitoring the adductor pollicis muscle and the flexor hallucis brevis muscle with the same subject.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with ASA classification 1-2 Patients consented to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with neuromuscular diseases Patients with difficult airway Patients who required rapid sequence induction

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to reappearance of train-of-four (TOF) count of one.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Baseline TOF ratio, compound muscle action potential, time to rocuronium administration to TOF count of zero, supramaximal current, time to reappearance of TOF count of 2, time to reappearance of TOF count of 4, final TOF ratio	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHajime Iwasaki

Asahikawa Medical University Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine

iwasakih@asahikawa-med.ac.jp0166-68-2583

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026