Skip to content

Comparing the effects of dynamic parameter- to static parameter-guided fluid resuscitation on organ functions in septic patients

Comparison in SOFA score between dynamic ultrasound-guidance and static measurement of central venous pressure for fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock at Thammasat University Hospital - SOFA-DUSCIS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000053677
Enrollment
104
Registered
2024-02-21
Start date
2019-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

sepsis

Interventions

Intervention: dynamic IVC variation-guided fluid resuscitation 1. Patients were categorized into mechanical ventilation (MV) and spontaneous breathing (SB) subgroups. 2. MV patients were measured b
18% and &gt
=18% being treated as fluid non-responsiveness, and fluid responsiveness, respectively. SB patients were measured by ultrasound for IVC collapsibility index with a value of &lt
50% and &gt
=50% being treated as fluid non-responsiveness and fluid responsiveness, respectively. 3.Crystalloid (mostly 0.9%NaCl solution) 500 milliliters (mL) in 15 minutes (min) was administered intravenousl
65 mmHg) received intravenous vasopressor. 5. All patients received standard treatment with intensive monitoring for 6 hours, and were tracked until shock resolution and discharge, transfer or death
8 and &gt
=8 mmHg being treated as responsiveness and non-responsiveness, respectively. 2. Fluid responsive patients received crystalloid (mostly 0.9%NaCl solution) intravenously 500 mL in 15 min and CVP meas
65 mmHg) received intravenous vasopressor. 4. All patients received standard treatment with intensive monitoring for 6 hours, and were tracked until shock resolution and discharge, tr

Sponsors

Thammasat University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) age of >=18 years 2) suspected infection 3) SOFA score of >=2 4) systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg or SBP decrease > 40 mmHg from the original level or mean arterial pressure (MAP) <70 mmHg 5) requirement of intravenous fluid to maintain stable hemodynamics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) pregnancy 2) pulmonary edema due to cardiovascular diseases 3) inability to be in a supine position, e.g., spine deformities 4) difficult or inaccurate US measurement of IVC diameter, e.g., IVC compression from any causes 5) limitation of central venous catheterization e.g., structural abnormalities of internal jugular vein or superior vena cava

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
change in the SOFA score from the diagnosis of sepsis to 72 hours later

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
SOFA score at 72 hours after the diagnosis of sepsis, change in the SOFA score from the diagnosis of sepsis to 7 days later, proportion of patients receiving vasopressor, duration of vasopressor, and incidence of pulmonary edema in 7 days after the diagnosis of sepsis

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactThiti Sricharoenchai

Thammasat University Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine

thiti_x@tu.ac.th+6629269794

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026