Skip to content

Comparison of Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in using airway management simulator by tracheal intubation Novice

Comparison of Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in using airway management simulator by tracheal intubation Novice - Comparison of Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in using airway management simulator by tracheal intubation Novice

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000053465
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-02-01
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

simulator

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tokushima Univesity
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Dental students with no prior experience in endotracheal intubation on patients or manikin models.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Adults with experience in endotracheal intubation on patients or manikin models.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation time difference between laryngoscope groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Maxillary incisor contact pressure difference between laryngoscope groups

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSatoru EGUCHI

Tokushima university Hospital Department of Dental Anesthesiology

seguchi@tokushima-u.ac.jp+81-88-633-7367

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026