Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective study

Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective study - Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective study

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000053250

Enrollment

184

Registered

2024-01-01

Start date

2024-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pelvic organ prolapse

Interventions

delayed absorbable suture: polydioxanone permanent suture: Tefdesser II

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with pelvic organ prolapse who have surgical indications for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at the time of obtaining consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have not agreed to the consent form for surgery. Switching from laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to another surgical intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessing composite failure within one year after using absorbable or permanent sutures during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy combined with supracervical hysterectomy.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Mesh-related complications: suture or mesh exposure	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHirotaka Sato

Hokusuikai-Kinen Hospital Department of urology

hirotakasato911@yahoo.co.jp0293033003

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026