Skip to content

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis with functional electrical stimulation intervention on gait disturbance in subacute hemiplegia patients -a series of single case design-

Effects of ankle-foot orthosis with functional electrical stimulation intervention on gait disturbance in subacute hemiplegia patients -a series of single case design- - Effects of ankle-foot orthosis with functional electrical stimulation intervention on gait disturbance

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000052001
Enrollment
6
Registered
2023-08-31
Start date
2023-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

For single cases, interventions will begin with gait practice with ankle-foot orthosis (period A1), transition to gait practice with ankle-foot orthosis plus functional electrical stimulation (period

Sponsors

Medical Corporation Juryo Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Stroke hemiplegic patients admitted to the Kaifukukirehabilitation ward of Medical Corporation Juryo Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital who meet the following conditions 1)Patients with insufficient ankle dorsiflexion angle during gait (dorsiflexion angle less than 0 degree during gait) 2)Patients receiving orthosis therapy for 1) 3)First seizure cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage 4)More than 1 month to 6 months after onset 5) Patients whose Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) are 2 (light assistance) or 3 (supervised) 6)No obvious paralytic symptoms or motor deficits on the nonparalytic side 7)Patients who can obtain ankle dorsiflexion movement using functional electrical stimulation (Patients without peripheral neuropathy such as common peroneal nerve palsy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients contraindicated to functional electrical stimulation(For example patients with a cardiac pacemaker , those with a history of epileptic seizures or those who are expected to have seizures, Persons with metal implants ) 2)Patients with cardiovascular disease and at risk for exercise 3)Patients whose ankle dorsiflexion angle has not reached 0 degree with orthokinetic exercise 4)Patients who are unable to understand the study description or cannot appeal for discontinuation of the study on their own in the event of abnormality. (For example mini mental state examination score: MMSE less than 21 points) 5)Patients under 18 years of age or over 85 years of age 6)Patients with severe sensory disturbance or marked muscle tone (modified Ashworth scale: MAS 3 or higher) 7)Patients who have difficulty understanding instructions or walking independently due to the effects of attention disorders or other cognitive dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
10m walk test(maximum walking speed)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ankle joint dorsiflexion angle during gait EMG using electromyography(tibialis anterior,gastrocnemius)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYasunori Tanaka

Medical Corporation Juryo Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital Department of Comprehensive Rehabilitation medicine

tanaka.y@juryo.or.jp096-345-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026