Skip to content

Comparison of treatments for pusher behavior after stroke : a series of N-of-1 trials

Comparison of treatments for pusher behavior after stroke : a series of N-of-1 trials - Comparison of treatments for pusher behavior

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000051090
Enrollment
21
Registered
2023-05-17
Start date
2023-05-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Single cases are randomly assigned conventional therapy for Pusher behavior including visual feedback training
standing/gait training with a knee-ankle-foot orthosis presented using vertical cues, and prone position therapy, electrical stimulation therapy compared for about 3 weeks (15 times).

Sponsors

Kohnan Hospital Sendai Japan
Lead Sponsor
Fukushima Medical University
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Among stroke patients who were admitted to Kohnan Hospital and prescribed rehabilitation, those who exhibited Pusher behavior (each subscale of Scale for contraversive pushing > 0)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1)Age under 20 years old (2)Patients with infratentorial lesion or bilateral hemispheric lesion (3)Patients with difficulty performing exercises in standing position for more than 20 minutes (such as maintaining standing posture, standing balance, gait training, etc.) However, those who can practice in a standing position for 20 minutes or more within 14 days will be eligible at that time. (4)Patients contraindicated to electrical stimulation therapy (patients with a cardiac pacemaker, those with a history of seizures or those who are expected to have seizures, those with wounds or skin diseases at the electrical stimulation site, patients with malignant tumors, Those with sensory disturbance in the non-paralytic upper limbs, those with deep vein thrombosis) (5)Patients who it is difficult to perform the prone position (tracheostomy, gastrostomy, and patients with extreme joint range of motion limitation in the hip joint or thoracolumbar spine) (6)Subjects with an extremely high risk of falling if assisted by a single therapist or evaluator (cases weighing 80 kg or more, for whom assistance by a single caregiver is assumed to be difficult)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Scale for contraversive pushing and Burke lateropulsion scale before and after treatment

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKazuto Oki

Kohnan Hospital Sendai Japan Department of Rehabillitation medicine

ookika0525@gmail.com022-248-2131

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026