The study started in the beginning of January 2019 and ended in January 2021. The institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.
Conditions
Interventions
1) the main group in which the TAP block was performed in early postoperative period (during the first 24 hrs). In addition, the patients of this group also received the intravenous administration of
TAP+NSAID"
.
2) the control group in which the epidural analgesia was used. As a local anesthetic, the 0.25% solution of bupivacaine was used. The 80 to 120 mg of bupivacaine solution were administered as a b
Epidural"
Sponsors
Pavlodar Branch of NCJSC "Semey Medical University"
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. adults 2. aged 18 to 75 3. male and female 4. ASA physical status of either I or II 5. written consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. children 2. ASA status III, IV, V, VI 3. Refusal to sign the consent 4. dementia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of an efficacy of TAP anesthesia to that of epidural anesthesia in managing the pain at 24 hrs after the laparoscopy surgery or laparotomy. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scores, satisfaction of patients and surgeons with anesthesia, hemodynamic criteria, oxygen saturation (SpO2), time of the transition of the patient from the inpatient to the ambulatory care and appearance of the adverse effects. | — |
Countries
Asia(except Japan)
Contacts
Public ContactRinat Ashzhanov
Pavlodar Branch of NCJSC "Semey Medical University" Department of Emergency Medicine
Outcome results
None listed