Emergency Medicine
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Niigata University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients admitted to each facility on an emergency basis and treated primarily by acute care physicians
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients who declined to participate in the study through an opt-out format Patients deemed inappropriate by the attending physician
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| (1) Whether or not ACP is performed during emergency department admission. 1-1. Rate the following on a 4-point scale (If ACP was performed) Has the surrogate decision maker been identified? Has the patient's understanding of the disease been confirmed? Have treatment goals been shared? Has the patient's medical record been adequately documented? 1-2. Related items (advance directives, DNAR, DNI, BSC, etc.) (2) Questionnaire regarding inpatient care to be administered to patients 2-1. Has there been adequate discussion between the patient and the health care provider? 2-2. Were the patient's own values shared with the medical staff? 2-3. Were the patient's wishes reflected in the treatment? 2-4. Does the patient feel satisfied with the treatment? | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactNatsuo Kamimura
Niigata Univercity Medical and Dental Hospirtal Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center
Outcome results
None listed