Tension-Free Aponeuroplasty Versus Prosthetic Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Resource-Limited Setting

Tension-Free Aponeuroplasty Versus Prosthetic Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial - Tension-Free Aponeuroplasty Versus Prosthetic Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000050603

Enrollment

200

Registered

2023-03-16

Start date

2020-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

unilateral primary inguinal hernia

Interventions

Herniorrhaphy with Tension-Free Aponeuroplasty Herniorrhaphy with Artificial Mesh

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more 20 years old Male person Unilateral primary inguinal hernia American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification less than three Obtained a written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with chronic cough Patients with obstructive lung disease Patients with a history of smoking or constipation Recurrent hernia Female patients Simultaneous bilateral operation American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification less than three equal or more three Patients with scrotal or inguinal pain due to other diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
incidence of chronic pain.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
other operative outcomes (operation time, postoperative stay, return to daily activity, complications, sensory disorders, recurrence rate...)	—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactFaisal Ahmed

Al-thora Hospital, Ibb university Department of Surgery

fmaaa2006@yahoo.com00967776089579

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026