Skip to content

The Influence of Gamification on Medical Students' Diagnostic Decision Making and Cost Reduction: A Cross-sectional Survey

The Influence of Gamification on Medical Students' Diagnostic Decision Making and Cost Reduction: A Cross-sectional Survey - The Influence of Gamification on Medical Students' Diagnostic Decision Making and Cost Reduction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000049765
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-12-14
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

diagnostic reasoning

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Chiba University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants comprised 30 medical students participating in clinical clerkship.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students who could not participate in any of the case scenarios for any reason were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the effects of gamification on diagnostic decision-making and medical cost reduction in case scenarios. Participants comprised 30 medical students participating in clinical clerkship. They were randomly assigned to 14 small group teams. Use of decision-making cards (DMCs) was gamified. The DMCs had the clinical information heading and medical cost on the front and details of clinical information on the back of the cards. First, each team was provided brief clinical information (age, gender, chief complaint, and history of present illness) in case scenarios. Subsequently, DMCs were distributed to them and they decided which cards to choose in turn. Then, the correct final diagnosis, the total number of cards drawn, and the total medical cost were scored. Faculty members debriefed the students about the process of the cards chosen. Four case scenarios were implemented and the order in which each team answered was randomized. Students completed a questionnaire about confidence in effective clinical decision-making, motivation to learn diagnostic decision-making, and awareness of medical cost before and after the educational intervention.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKosuke Ishizuka

Chiba University Hospital Department of General Medicine

e103007c@yokohama-cu.ac.jp+81432227171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026