Is Sleep Quality as Observed by Sleep Electroencephalography Related to Functional Recovery in Patients with Stroke?

Relationship between sleep assessment index using sleep electroencephalogram and functional outcome in patients with cerebral infarction in the recovery phase - Relationship between sleep and functional outcome in cerebral infarction patients

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000049739

Enrollment

Registered

2022-12-15

Start date

2022-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cerebral infarction

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) First ischemic stroke 2) 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Those with cerebellum lesion 2) Those with other neuropsychiatric disorders 3) Those with a history of sleep disorders prior to the onset of ischemic stroke 4) Those with dementia or aphasia to the extent that they are unable to answer the questionnaire 5) Those with new functional impairment due to complications during hospitalization.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Partial correlation between Arousal Index and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) effectiveness, excluding the effect of age and depression using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
A) Correlation between the following items and FIM effectiveness i) Sleep variables: Sleep latency, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, Wake-time After Sleep Onset (WASO), arousal index, duration and incidence of each sleep stage, REM latency ii) Subjective Sleep Quality: Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Doi et al., 2000]. iii) Anxiety and depressive symptoms: Japanese version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [Hatta et al., 1998]. iv) Motor function: Japanese version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) [Amano et al, 2018; Nakazono et al, 2020]. v) Cognitive function: japanese version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) [Sugishita, 2006], Japanese version of Raven's Colored Progressive Materices (RCPM) [Sugishita, 1993]. B) Correlations among the above items	—

Measure

Time frame

A) Correlation between the following items and FIM effectiveness i) Sleep variables: Sleep latency, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, Wake-time After Sleep Onset (WASO), arousal index, duration and incidence of each sleep stage, REM latency ii) Subjective Sleep Quality: Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Doi et al., 2000]. iii) Anxiety and depressive symptoms: Japanese version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [Hatta et al., 1998]. iv) Motor function: Japanese version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) [Amano et al, 2018; Nakazono et al, 2020]. v) Cognitive function: japanese version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) [Sugishita, 2006], Japanese version of Raven's Colored Progressive Materices (RCPM) [Sugishita, 1993]. B) Correlations among the above items

—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKyohei Matsuda

Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University Department of Rehabilitation Medicine

k.matsuda@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp0422-47-5511

Outcome results