normal retina, papillary edema, branch retinal vein occlusion
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The following medical students and physicians whose consent was obtained during the period: Medical students and junior residents training in pediatrics Senior residents training in pediatrics, pediatricians, emergency and intensive care physicians All affiliated with the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine or the University of Tokyo Hospitals.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: The medical students or physicians who do not consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| For each of the adult and pediatric eye models, two ophthalmologists independently evaluated whether the stored videos by study participants were of diagnostic value or not. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| (A) For each of the adult and pediatric eye models, two ophthalmologists independently evaluate the stored video quality (i) and (ii). (i) Overall image quality (3-point scale: excellent, fair, and poor) Excellent: the entire posterior pole is in focus. The posterior pole includes the retina between the optic nerve papilla and the arcade vessels, the macula and the optic nerve papilla. Acceptable: too bright, too dark, or out of focus but sufficient to determine the presence or absence of a lesion Impossible: out of focus or obscured by reflections or artifacts. (ii) Accuracy of depiction of each anatomic merkmal (optic nerve papilla, macula, upper arcade vessels, lower arcade vessels) (3-point scale: not visible, visible but image quality is poor, visible and image quality is adequate) (iii) Percentage of correct diagnosis by the study participants (iv) Inter-rater agreement rate between the two opthalmologists (B) Comparison between adult and pediatric eye models for all the above items | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
The University of Tokyo Hospital The Department of Pediatrics