Spine Surgery Patients
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Among the patients who underwent spinal surgery and were monitored for MEP (1) ASA-PS1 and 2 patients who are 18 years of age or older (ii) Patients who have given a full explanation of the study and who have given their free and voluntary written consent based on full understanding.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with epileptic seizures or history of epilepsy 2) Patients with muscle disease 3) Patients with peripheral neuropathy (iv) Patients in shock (5) Patients in coma (vi) Patients with a history of drug dependence (g) Patients with hepatic dysfunction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Is there a difference in the amplitude and latency of MEP and SEP in the nerve travel area unrelated to the surgical site between general anesthesia with propofol and general anesthesia with remimazolam? Compare the difference between control and final MEP values in each case. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Is there a difference between propofol and remimazolam in the time required from the end of anesthetic administration until neurologic findings can be obtained? | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactKotaro Hamada
University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan Department of Anesthesiology
Outcome results
None listed