Skip to content

Effect of portable ultrasound-guided trigger point block with levobupivacaine on myofascial pain syndrome in patients with advanced cancer

Effect of portable ultrasound-guided trigger point block with levobupivacaine on myofascial pain syndrome in patients with advanced cancer - Effect of portable ultrasound-guided trigger point block on myofascial pain syndrome in patients with advanced cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000049105
Enrollment
39
Registered
2022-10-05
Start date
2022-10-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

myofascial pain syndrome

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Shinshu University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Inpatients aged 20 to 85 who have been diagnosed with advanced cancer (2) Subjects whose palliative care team is intervening (3) Subjects taking opioids (4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) 2-4 (5) Subjects diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome that meets River's diagnostic criteria (6) Subjects who have the pain of 4/10 or higher on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in the affected area of myofascial pain syndrome (7) Subjects whose cause of myofascial pain syndrome is determined to be bed rest for 1 week or longer (8) Subjects who can visualize the muscle layer of the painful area of myofascial pain syndrome using a portable ultrasound device (9) Individuals who are clear-minded and have the ability to make decisions (10) Subjects were judged to be able to keep quiet during the procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Subjects taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs (2) Subjects who are suggested to be prone to bleeding (3) Subjects with severe cytopenia (4) Those who are suggested to be susceptible to infection (5) Subjects with skin abnormalities such as redness, swelling, and edema at painful areas suspected of MPS (6) Subjects with chronic heart failure (7) Subjects with serious renal impairment (8) Subjects with severe liver disorder (9) Subjects who are allergic to local anesthetics (10) Subjects whose cause of the pain may be other than MPS due to bed rest (11) Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35 or more, or those who have difficulty in visualizing the muscle layer of the MPS pain site with a portable ultrasound device (12) Subjects who cannot keep quiet during the procedure (13) A person judged to have no decision-making capacity (14) Others who are judged to be inappropriate as subjects by the principal investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the difference in pain (NRS) on day 8 compared to pre-block

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) Difference in pain (NRS) after block on day 1 compared to pain before block on day 1 (2) Difference in pain (NRS) before block on day 4 compared to pain before block on day 1 (3) Difference in pain (NRS) after block on day 4 compared to pain before block on day 1 (4) Difference in opioid dose (oral morphine equivalent) before block on day 1 and on day 8 (5) Frequency of adverse events

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKenji Yamamoto

Shinshu University Hospital Palliative care center

cab55640@yahoo.co.jp0263-35-4600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026