Skip to content

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Upper Extremity Functional Training with Goal Setting by Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand

A Study of the Effect of Upper Limb Functional Training with Goal Setting by Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand on the Amount of Use and Motor Function of the Upper Limb of the Paralyzed Side - Effect of upper limb function training with ADOC-H

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000048825
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-09-01
Start date
2022-09-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage

Interventions

The intervention that goal setting of upper limb use in daily life by Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice for Hand(ADOC-H), monitoring and problem-solving technique in addition to conventiona
s bedside table so that the patient can check them at any time. When the patient is able to use the paralyzed upper limb in the selected situation and the occupational therapist determines that the pa
s ability to use the paralytic upper extremity in the areas determined by the ADOC-H at each intervention. Problem-solving: We discuss with the patient how to use the paralytic upper limb, and encoura

Sponsors

Ina Central Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 20 years or older who have been admitted to Ina Central Hospital and have been diagnosed with stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with limited range of motion of the upper limbs and weakness in the history before the onset of stroke. 2)Patients with cognitive decline with a Mini-Mental State Examination of less than 24 points 3)Patients who have difficulty communicating with ADOC-H due to impaired consciousness or higher brain dysfunction 4)Patients who could not provide informed consent 5)Patients who scored 0 points on either the knee-mouth test or the finger test of the SIAS paralyzed upper limb movement item at the time of admission, or patients who scored 5 points on both items. 6)Patients with recurrent stroke during hospitalization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Motor Activity Log Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Upper Extremity Motor)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMasato Ikegami

Ina Central Hospital Department of Rehabilitation

reha@inahp.jp0265-72-3121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026