Comparison of breathing methods in conventional endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Comparison of breathing methods in conventional endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial - breathing methods in conventional endoscopy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000047848

Enrollment

126

Registered

2022-07-01

Start date

2022-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

upper gastrointestinal diseases

Interventions

oral breathing nasal breathing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i) patients aged 20 or above ii) those willing to undergo transoral endoscopy iii) those who agreed to give their written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i) patients who were willing to undergo sedation-assisted endoscopy ii) patients who had a scheduled therapeutic intervention iii) patients with a history of upper gastrointestinal surgery iv) patients who refused to provide written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
patient tolerance and endoscopic operability	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKeitaro TAKAHASHI

Asahikawa medical university Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology

ktakaha@asahikawa-med.ac.jp0166-68-2462

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026