A comparison of the gaps between capability ADL and performance ADL in the FIM instrument in the patients with stroke using an item response theory analysis

A comparison of the gaps between capability ADL and performance ADL in the FIM instrument in the patients with stroke using an item response theory analysis - A comparison of the gaps between capability ADL and performance ADL in the FIM instrument in the patients with stroke using an item response theory analysis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000047573

Enrollment

132

Registered

2022-04-23

Start date

2022-06-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with stroke who admitted to our recovery rehabilitation ward from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1)Patients transferred during hospitalization; (2)Patients with minimum and maximum scores on the FIM motor subscale (13 and 91 points); (3)Patients with lack of the FIM scores on admission and discharge; (4)Patients who refuse to participate in this study based on the optout.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Capability ADL and performance ADL in the Functional Independence Measure motor subscale on admission and discharge	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1)Brunnstrom recovery stage 2)Functional Independence Measure cognitive subscale 3)Length of hospital stay (days) 4)Discharge destination	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYuta Tauchi

Hyogo College of Medicine Sasayama Medical Center Department of Rehabilitation

tau24@hyo-med.ac.jp079-552-7381

Outcome results