Skip to content

Highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester supplementation in the management of type 2 diabetic patients: effects on renal function, on dyslipidemia, and on hyperglycemia.

Highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester supplementation in the management of type 2 diabetic patients: effects on renal function, on dyslipidemia, and on hyperglycemia. - Highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester supplementation in the management of type 2 diabetic patients: effects on renal function, on dyslipidemia, and on hyperglycemia.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000045913
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-10-30
Start date
2020-06-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

type2 diabetes

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Department of Internal Medicine, Ehime Rousai Hospital, 13-27, Minamikomatsubaracho, Niihama, Ehime 792-0863, Japan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The subjects were type 2 diabetic outpatients who were newly prescribed EPA at 1800mg/day. This prescription was either for the management of hypertriglyceridemia, or due to the diagnosis of CVD risk.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (a)receiving hemodialysis;(b) being suspected of having kidney disease other than DKD;(c) being suspected of having muscle atrophy because of gait disturbance;(d) being treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (both treatments have been reported to have renoprotective effects);(e) receiving additional prescription of new class of glucose-lowering drugs, or new agents which can influence eGFR, within 12 months from the initiation of EPA administration; (f) new onset of systemic disease; (g) the patient's eGFR was measured less than six times during the follow-up period; (h) the patient's UACR was not measured either within the six months before the initiation of EPA administration or at 12 months; (i) the patient's BMI and blood pressure were not measured within the three months before the initiation of or at 12 months.(j) the patient's eGFR was more than 90 ml/min/1.73m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was compared at the initiation of EPA administration (baseline) and after 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The changes in patients'demographics and laboratory data including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and lipid parameters were compared at the initiation of EPA administration (baseline) and after 12 months.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKazuaki Nakai

Ehime Rousai Hospital Department of Internal Medicine

knakai@ehimeh.johas.go.jp0897336191

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026