clinical reasoning
Conditions
Interventions
Hybrid PBL
Pure PBL
Sponsors
Chiba University Hospital
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The study was conducted at a single facility of Chiba University Hospital (hereinafter referred to as "our department") in Japan. The subjects were 109 fifth-year medical students of Chiba University School of Medicine who participated in clinical practice at our department from January 2020 to October 2021. All the subjects received lectures and simulation training in basic medicine and clinical medicine by the fourth year, and took computer-based testing (CBT) and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) before clinical practice to evaluate their skills. They have passed the computer-based testing (CBT) and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) before clinical practice.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: The students who could not participate in any of the PBL tutorials due to sickness or school events were excluded from this study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| We planned to conduct a study of PBL in clinical reasoning education in general medicine by dividing students into two groups: the Hybrid PBL group and the Pure PBL group. In order to evaluate the learning outcomes of Hybrid PBL, we assessed the achievement of the two groups in PBL tutorials, their satisfaction with the entire session, their confidence in the educational strategy for acquiring clinical reasoning skills, and the performance of each student on a test at the end of the study. | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactKosuke Ishizuka
Chiba University Hospital Department of General Medicine
Outcome results
None listed