Skip to content

Which determines isCGM sensor accuracy, patient or sensor itself?

Which determines isCGM sensor accuracy, patient or sensor itself? - Which determines isCGM sensor accuracy, patient or sensor itself?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000044889
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-07-17
Start date
2021-07-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 diabetes

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Inuyama chuo general hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Twenty outpatients with type 2 diabetes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Sensors where mean absolute relative difference (MARD) could not be evaluated more than 9 times judged to be unsuitable for participation for medical reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between sensors in all patients and distribution of MARD

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between sensors and distribution of MARD in each patient Correlation between patients and distribution of MARD

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSoichi Takeishi

Inuyama Chuo General Hospital Diabetes

souichi19811225@yahoo.co.jp0568-62-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026