EVALUATION OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PATIENT CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EPIDURAL ANALGESIA

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PATIENT CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VERSUS CONVENTIONAL EPIDURAL ANALGESIA - SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PCEA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000044487

Enrollment

Registered

2021-06-10

Start date

2019-03-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

IN ORTHOPEDIC LOWER LIMB SURGERIES

Interventions

patient controlled epidural analgesia Intermittent epidural bolus

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Either sex ASA grade 1 and 2 Age group between 18 to 65 years Elective orthopedic lower limb surgeries of approximately 2 to 3 hrs duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal Neuromuscular disorders Infection at the puncture site Bleeding disorders Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/mts2) History of allergy and sensitivity to local anesthetics. Patient unable to understand the visual analog score Patients of significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, pulmonary diseases Failure of spinal anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Hemodynamic parameters Quality of postoperative analgesia	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative adverse effect	—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public Contactbabita ramdev

maharishi markandeshwar university anaesthesia

drtatinenivenu@gmail.com9530581040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026