Skip to content

Effect of orientation of lateral position on spinal anesthesia for proximal femoral fractures

Effect of orientation of lateral position on spinal anesthesia for proximal femoral fractures - Effect of orientation of lateral position on spinal anesthesia for proximal femoral fractures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000043694
Enrollment
78
Registered
2021-03-24
Start date
2021-03-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

proximal femoral fractures

Interventions

Lateral position with the fracture site up Since there is no clear difference in the prevalence of proximal femoral fractures (femoral neck fracture, femoral trochanteric fracture). Therefore, perf

Sponsors

Aidu Chuo Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fracture at our hospital and meet all of the following three items 1. 20 years old and over 2. Spinal anesthesia is scheduled 3. Obtained written informed consent from the patient or patient's family regarding participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Corresponds to any of the following 1. Fractures may dislocate depending on lateral position 2. Atrial fibrillation: Heart rate is difficult to evaluate 3. Taking beta-blocker: Possibility of little fluctuation in heart rate 4. Cannot take the lateral decubitus position 5. No / less pain in the fractured part (During continuous opioid administration, use of analgesics within 6 hours, hemiplegia on the fracture side, etc.) 6. Patients who are judged to be incompatible by anesthesiologist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage (%) of strong pain (Pain score 3 points or more) when changing from supine to lateral position Pain score using this study is as follows: 0: calm 1: facial grimacing 2: moaning 3: screaming 4: unable to proceed

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Changes in heart rate during positioning 2. Pain score 3. Quality of position for spinal anesthesia (1: unsatisfactory, 2: satisfactory, 3: good, 4: very good) 4. Time spent on spinal anesthesia [min]

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public Contactkeisuke Yoshida

Aidu Chuo Hospital Department of Anesthesiology

kei-y7of@fmu.ac.jp0242251515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026