familial adenomatous polyposis
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. FAP patients who visited Ishikawa Gastrointestinal clinic between approval date and December 31, 2023 2. aged 16 years or older at the time of endoscopy 3. regardless of gender 4. Outpatients only
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Evaluated not to be appropriate for inclusion by attending physician 2. When the subject refuses to participate in this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Characteristics of endoscopic findings compared with conventional white light of linked color imaging and blue laser imaging of neoplastic lesions in fundic gland polyp in familial adenomatous polyposis | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Usability of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) 2. Usability of colonoscopy in FAP 3. Compare the detection rate of polyps conventional white light of linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI) of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in FAP 4. Compare the detection rate of colon polyps conventional white light of LCI and BLI in FAP 5. Compare the qualititative diagnosis of polyps conventional white light of LCI and BLI of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in FAP 6. Compare the detection rate of colon polyps conventional white light of LCI and BLI in FAP | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Ishikawa gastrointestinal clinic Director