Skip to content

Evaluation of the efficacy of the detection of the significant cancer and the safety in MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: multi-institutional study in Japan

Evaluation of the efficacy of the detection of the significant cancer and the safety in MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: multi-institutional study in Japan - Evaluation of the efficacy of the detection of the significant cancer and the safety in MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: multi-institutional study in Japan

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000042397
Enrollment
400
Registered
2020-11-09
Start date
2020-11-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prostate cancer suspected

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tokai University
Lead Sponsor
Kanazawa Medical University, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Nagoya City University, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Okayama University, Juntendo University, KKR Takamatsu Hospital, Kyoto University, Nara Medical University, Hirosaki University, Public Central Hospital of Matto Ishikawa, Mimihara General Hospital, Takeda General Hospital, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious diseases Center Komagome Hospital
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. the patients with and less tha PSA 20ng/mL 2. the patients who are suspected as having prostate cancer 3. the patients who agreed with the informaed consent of the present study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. the patiens who have fatal disease 2. the patiens who are suspected as having progressive prostate cancer 3. the patiens who are suspected as having progressive prostate cancer with digital rectal examination 4. the patiens who are suspected as having progressive prostate cancer on MRI 5. the patiens who have abnormal blood coagulation 6. the patients who have the allergy for the anesthesia 7. the patients who were regarded as being inappropriate 8. the person with less than 20 years olds

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Detection of the significant cancer in the patients and biopsy cores of systematic and target biopsies

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a) cancer core length, cancer core percentage, and Gleason score in the biopsy cores of systematic and target biopsies b) the relation between the PI-RADS category, cancer core length, cancer core percentage, and Gleason score in the biopsy cores of target biopsies c) examination time c-1) time for segmentaion c-2) time for anesthesia c-3) time for the entire examination time for target biopsy time for systematic biopsy c-4) operating room usage time d) extension of hospital stay, and the reason e) emergency outpatient consultation, and the reason f) analysis using whole gland specimens for the detecion of significant cancer in systematic and target biopsy Safety Pain in the biopsy site, bleeding from the biopsy site, infection in the biopsy site, urinary tract infection, macroscopic hematuria, fever, urinary retension, and other (Grades of the complications would be evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSunao Shoji

Tokai University School of Medicine Department of Urology

sunashoj@mail.goo.ne.jp+81-463-93-1121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026