Skip to content

Comparison of outcomes between robotic and conventional (laparoscopic and open) gastrectomy

Comparison of outcomes between robotic and conventional (laparoscopic and open) gastrectomy - Comparison of results between robotic and conventional gastrectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000041857
Enrollment
500
Registered
2020-09-25
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radically resectable gastric cancer

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Aged 20 year over. (2) Histologically diagnosed with gastric cancer. (3) Resectability of RO

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients who are unable to give consent for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the number of lymph node dissection between RG and LG/OG

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of surgical outcomes (operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, etc.) and number of lymph node dissections between RG and LG/OG by site

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSachiko Kaida

Shiga University of Medical Science Department of Surgery

kaida@belle.shiga-med.ac.jp077-548-2238

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026