Skip to content

Comparison of visual disability grade between Automatic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry

Comparison of visual disability grade between Automatic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry - Comparison of visual disability grade between Automatic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000041571
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-08-27
Start date
2019-12-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subjects had been certified as visual disability grade(Japan)

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects had been certified as visual disability grade. Subjects who have consented to undergo two tests, Automatic perimetry and Goldmann perimetry, on the same day.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Under 19.Subjects had not been certified as visual disability grade. Subjects who cannot agree to take two tests on the same day. Subjects who find it difficult to test the two visual fields due to cognitive and physical aspects.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Each test result Each test time Fatigue after each test

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYamaguchi Aya

Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center Ophthalmology

ortomiya@omiya.jichi.ac.jp048-647-2111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026